First Acts of the New Crown

There are many reasons to say that the ridiculous pharma industry is best as is, is perfect, because all those useless eaters are going to do everything to wreck their health and those around them, so why not just let them speed up the process and let them go to their graves forthwith. But Ruinur must admit that vaccination is nonetheless one of the most unsettling of all manifestations of this. No doubt Bill Gates, that grinning flying-monkey vacant idiot posing as a savant, that suited card-carrying eunuch member of the international actors' guild, has done more than most to push the idea that vaccination is a very clever thing.
See, blood is the center of a person's... well, everything. Health, body, mind, vitality, good humour, wit - the lot. And to stick a needle through the skin and fill the blood, not only with foreign matter, but a cocktail of dead material, chemicals which are not found in living organisms, and heavy metals, is... remarkable. But further than this, the neutralisation of the man and the training of women and mothers has made them actually queue up to have this done to their children. Helpless children, at such a crucial juncture in their lives. So trusting of their parents, so helpless to make good sound decisions. And, to have so many of the things! Babies have sometimes a dozen of the things, almost all at once. The barbarity of this is almost beyond comprehension. (hmm, bar...)
Of course, the germ theory was built to bring the ancient superstitions of evil spirits and the like into the techno-era, and like I said one could argue that they deserve all that's coming to them. But this mutilation of children, as with circumcision and pederast rings, is surely a place we are to draw the line? Adults (meaning, corrupted and useless pseudo-men and pseudo-women) can go ahead and do whatever to themselves. But given that they do not "own" their own children and hence can not legally sign off on such treasonous acts, is it not an area for the Crown to step in?
That's us, by the way.

The Crown

 Then, following in the steps of Sir William Markby, I ventured to say that this corporation sole has shown itself to be no “juristic person,” but is either a natural man or a juristic abortion.

Maitland

pavlov

Is it really so terrible to welcome multiple income streams… or multiple lovers? Can we not simply relax and allow our desires to show up, without presenting a list of fear-based demands that constricts the flow?
Can you allow yourself to receive through all parts of the spectrum of potential, including the bands that expose your limiting beliefs and make you feel vulnerable and afraid? If you can do that, you will soon forget what it’s like to experience scarcity.

Steve Pavlina (also recommended - his 10 reasons you should never get a job)

O'Nassis

equals.

Own Asses.

One Direction (boy band on MTV last night). equals. Wand Erection.

Women's love

Could it be that men must save themselves from the love of women?

It's the mothers' love that sent Ruinur to school. That sends out their sons to die in wars. That do not understand how not to operate under the brothel-system of pawnage and bondage - or rather, DO understand, and only that.

It's a woman's love that nags and harrasses and shit-tests her man at every opportunity. That tried many times to make Ruinur feel utterly guilty about living his life to the fullest.

Could it be that a woman's love is dys-love, is scorn? The love of Cybele, that would be surrounded by eunuchs.

It's obvious to any man who's lived a day in his life that you will only be served faithfully by a woman when you treat her... well, rather like a dog. Tolerate her, treat her with amused mastery. Sneer at her jokes and she'll get wet. Hell, if you face-palm her onto the floor she'll try to hump your leg.

Rather different to man's love. One can truly sympathise with the gay view that men are for love and women for breeding. Kids for pleasure, well perhaps, but not in the way they seem to mean it.

trust law the engine and the remedy for social engineering by very degenerate types

Now no doubt our free foundation of charitable institutions has had its dark side, and no doubt we discovered that some supervision by the State of the administration of charitable trust funds had become necessary, but let us observe that Englishmen in one generation after another have had open to them a field of social experimentation such as could not possibly have been theirs, had not the trustee met the law’s imperious demand for a definite owner. Even if we held the extreme opinion that endowed charities have done more harm than good, it might well be said of us that we have learned this lesson in the only way it could be learnt.

ibid.

How much longer are people going to volunteer to be the trustees of the public corporations? Just how fucked do things have to get?

whereas

But it was of “the Publick” that we were speaking, and I believe that “the publick” first becomes prominent in connexion with the National Debt...
“Whereas,” said an Act of 1786, “the Publick stands indebted to” the East India Company in a sum of four millions and more.
What is the Publick which owes the National Debt? We try to evade that question. We
try to think of that debt not as a debt owed by a person, but as a sum charged upon a
pledged or mortgaged thing, upon the Consolidated Fund.
One of our subterfuges has been that of making the king a trustee (vel quasi) for
unincorporated groups. Another of our subterfuges has been that of slowly
substituting “the Crown” for King or Queen.

Frederic Maitland, Collected Papers